The Plan document lacks credibility. It contains mistakes, and is hard to understand
|
Numerical errors
Terms not defined (“School Maximum”, "total Capacity", “EB”, “WB”)
Cryptic statements eg para 3.32
Incorrect captions
|
Table 3.1 shows that 41 pupils live within 2km of the school, giving 29% of the total. In para 3.5 it says that 26% live within 2km. Similarly with Table 3.2, where a total of 31% in the table is reported as 40%.. Given the presence of such simple errors, what are the implications for the rest of the information in the Plan?
Various terms have not been defined, making it difficult to use the information provided.
"It should be noted that while unrestricted parking stress was high at Wensleydale Gardens during the afternoon surveys, the maximum total capacity during the afternoon survey was 23.5%, indicating ample space for cars to manoeuvre and pass one another." Capacity cannot be described as a percentage by itself. What does this paragraph mean?
The second part of Table 3.12 lacks aheader - presumably it presents data for 16 November?
|